Showing posts with label america. Show all posts
Showing posts with label america. Show all posts

Thursday, 12 December 2013

Drone strike kills 15 wedding party-goers in Yemen


Drone strike kills 15 wedding party-goers in Yemen instead of Al-Qaeda convoy

Fifteen people who had been heading to a wedding in Yemen have been killed in an air strike. Local media reported that a drone attack had been responsible, and the party-goers had been hit instead of an Al-Qaeda convoy.

“An air strike missed its target and hit a wedding car convoy, ten people were killed immediately and another five who were injured died after being admitted to the hospital,” a Yemeni security official told Reuters.

Five more people were injured in the attack which took place in Radda, central al-Bayda province on Thursday, the source added.

The group had been en route to the the village of Qaifa, the site of the wedding, when it was hit. The assault left charred bodies strewn in the road and vehicles on fire, officials told AP.

While officials would not identify the source of the air strike, local and tribal media sources attributed the deaths to a drone attack.

No comment followed as to whose drone may have delivered the strike. However, the US is known for its counter-terrorism assistance to the country which at times includes UAV raids. 

Washington has recently increased the intensity of its drone strikes in Yemen - despite widespread criticism sparked by the fact that strikes are not always accurate. In October, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Counterterrorism Ben Emmerson said that US drone strikes killed 2,200 in the past decade, 400 of whom were civilians. 

Yemen is considered to be the Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)’s main foothold of what is deemed the most active wing of the militant network. 

Critics maintain that the drone strikes program in the country has done nothing to stem the growth of Al-Qaeda, and has even increased support for the terror network.

Source: RT News

Do You Know What 1 Trillion Dollars Looks Like?

The U.S. national debt is now over 17 trillion dollars. The animation above puts into perspective how truly inconceivable 1 trillion dollars is. 




Related Videos:

Who owns the federal reserve?

Why The Whole Banking System Is A Scam

When Will The Economy Collapse

99% Of You Won't Believe This

The image below is a thumbnail only








Thursday, 28 November 2013

How Ron Paul Was Cheated Out Of Presidency

A compilation of footage that shows how the establishment used illegal tactics to get Ron Paul out of the presidential running. Everything from bias to voter fraud.

Youtube have already tried to remove this video so please share before it's removed again.



The image below is a thumbnail only

Friday, 22 November 2013

Matt Damon's Epic Speech ''The Problem Is Civil Obedience''

Matt Damon isn’t asking you to start a revolution, but when you hear this, you might anyway. If you don’t love what you’re hearing after the first 29 seconds, jump to 3:45 for a nugget of truth that every American can stand behind.



More inspiring speeches:

Amazing Anti-War Speech

Woody Harrelson's Powerful Video - Thoughts from within

Super 'End The Fed' Speech

The Girl Who Silenced The World

Ron Paul's Amazing 'What If' Speech


The image below is for thumbnail purposes only





Monday, 18 November 2013

Former FBI Agent Reveals Who Really Killed JFK



A retired FBI Agent and Police Chief, who was one of the original investigators in Dallas examining the JFK assassination, stumbles upon records and reports that were doctored. He knows that, because he filed the original reports. His decade long investigation would take him deep into history and to the National Archives and beyond. Step by step he says he learned and can prove that Oswald did not kill JFK.

Is he telling the truth? Trying to capitalize on a tragic event? Or, is he just another Illuminati drone sent to provide disinformation in order to keep us from the real truth?



What do most Americans believe happened that day fifty years ago? You’ll be surprised!



And here’s another look at the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Jesse Ventura talks with Bill Newman, one of the only living witnesses who stood so close,  he could have nearly jumped forward and touched President Kennedy at the exact moment Kennedy was shot.  Excitedly standing by the street that day with his wife and two small children, Bill Newman had the best view of the tragedy that would forever remain a mystery, and forever be burned within his mind.
The strange thing is, he was barely questioned by the authorities. Why? More than likely because the people behind it already knew who they would blame, and it wasn’t going to be Bill Newman!

JFK Assassination–Jesse Ventura



According to a recent article in The Guardian:
When John Kerry fuels doubts that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone just as publishers unleash a torrent of JFK assassination books you have to ask yourself: conspiracy? Did the the secretary of state pull the trigger on a clandestine publishing industry marketing plan? Are bookstores in on it? Is Hollywood connected? Or did Kerry act alone? We may never know.
We do know that Kennedy nostalgia and scrutiny are in overdrive on the eve of the 50th anniversary of his murder, with dozens of new books advancing theories novel and dusty over who fired the fatal shots at the motorcade in Dallas. Options include Fidel Castro, the mafia, the CIA, J Edgar Hoover, Lyndon Johnson, the secret service or, on the far outer fringes of speculation, Joe DiMaggio.
Kerry caused astonishment when he waded into the debate by telling NBC that he suspected Oswald had external help or inspiration, possibly from Cuba or Russia. “To this day, I have serious doubts that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.”
Even Kerry himself said it! How can there be doubt with so much information to support that Oswald was NOT the guilty party?

Sec. of State John Kerry Says Oswald Didn’t Act Alone In Assassination Of President Kennedy!



President John F Kennedy’s Speech, Warning Us What We All Globally Face



YouTube Desc:
One of the last speeches he made before he was murdered. A great man cut down in his prime for telling the truth.
These very things, and worse, are happening before our eyes! They have become more and more over the passing years. Do not be fooled, and do not allow yourself to be dumbed-down by society! Remain awake and do not sleep, lest you be taken for a fool!
36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only. 37 But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, 39 and did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. 40 Then two men will be in the field: one will be taken and the other left. 41 Two women will be grinding at the mill: one will be taken and the other left. 42 Watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming. 43 But know this, that if the master of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed his house to be broken into. 44 Therefore you also be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.   Matthew 24:36-44

Creepy! First TV Commercial Shown After JFK Assassination



Article Source : FreePatriot.org


Saturday, 16 November 2013

Invisibility Cloaks Designed For U.S Military

The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (DECE) at the University of Toronto (UoT) have revealed researchers created a cloak that is thin, scalable and adaptive to various objects and sizes to hide an object to radar detection.
So far, the object is still visible to the human eye; however this “practical” approach is being hailed as a step toward an actual invisibility cloak.
Researchers said: “We’ve demonstrated a different way of doing it. It’s very simple: instead of surrounding what you’re trying to cloak with a thick metamaterial shell, we surround it with one layer of tiny antennas, and this layer radiates back a field that cancels the reflections from the object.”
Indeed, the array of small antennas that expel the electromagnetic field surrounding the cloak cause the “invisibility” that renders the object un-seeable to radar systems.
Called an active electromagnetic cloak (AEMC), this device “uses an array of elementary sources to cancel the scattered fields created by an object. An active interior cloak does this by placing the sources along the boundary of the object.”
This technology “can be thought of as introducing a discontinuity in the field to cancel out the scattered field by the object.”


The process of cloaking was explained as: “Picture a mailbox sitting on the street. When light hits the mailbox and bounces back into your eyes, you see the mailbox. When radio waves hit the mailbox and bounce back to your radar detector, you detect the mailbox. [Professor George] Eleftheriades and [PhD student Michael] Selvanyagam’s system wraps the mailbox in a layer of tiny antennas that radiate a field away from the box, cancelling out any waves that would bounce back. In this way, the mailbox becomes undetectable to radar.”


Andrea Alu , professor at the University of Texas (UoT), commented : “Our active cloak is a completely new concept and design, aimed at beating the limits of [current cloaks] and we show that it indeed does. If you want to make an object transparent at all angles and over broad bandwidths, this is a good solution. We are looking into realizing this technology at the moment, but we are still at the early stages.”
Seven years ago, the first “invisibility cloak” was revealed that could “bended microwaves around a small copper cylinder which allowed it to vanish.”
Alu said: “If you suppress scattering in one range, you need to pay the price, with interest, in some other range. For example, you might make a cloak that makes an object invisible to red light. But if you were illuminated by white light (containing all colours) you would actually look bright blue, and therefore stand out more.”
The team at UoT, under Alu, have introduced “the concept and practical design of broadband, ultrathin cloaks based on non- Foster, negatively capacitive metasurfaces. By using properly tailored, active frequency- selective screens conformal to an object, within the realm of a practical realization, is shown that it is possible to drastically reduce the scattering over a wide frequency range in the microwave regime, orders of magnitude broader than any available passive cloaking technology. The proposed active cloak may impact not only invisibility and camouflaging, but also practical antenna and sensing applications.”
In 2012, Hyperstealth announced they have developed SmartCamo, a material that can conceal the wearer by matching their surroundings.
By bending light, the SmartCamo uses nanotechnology “so the object might be invisible to microwaves or infrared” – yet not simultaneously.






Saturday, 9 November 2013

Dad Calls Cops on Son to Teach Him a Lesson, Cops Shoot Son Dead




A father’s attempt to teach his son a lesson for taking his truck without permission ended in tragedy Monday after a local police officer shot the teenager dead.
James Comstock told the Des Moines Register he called the police on his son Tyler after the latter took the former’s truck in retaliation for refusing to buy him cigarettes.
Ames Police Officer Adam McPherson reportedly spotted the lawn care company vehicle and pursued it onto the Iowa State University campus, where a brief standoff ensued after Tyler allegedly refused orders to turn off the engine.
McPherson eventually fired six shots into the truck, two of which struck Tyler who was later pronounced dead.
The official report claims the action was necessary in order “to stop the ongoing threat to the public and the officers.”
Tyler’s dad says he was unarmed at the time.

“So he didn’t shut the damn truck off, so let’s fire six rounds at him?” exclaimed Gary Shepley, Tyler’s step-grandfather. “We’re confused, and we don’t understand.”
James said his son had his fair share of minor troubles with the law, and was distraught over a recent breakup with his girlfriend, but was in the process of turning his life around, and was working on obtaining his GED at Des Moines Area Community College.

“He was a smart kid. He made his own computers. He was interested in IT,”
 James told the Register.
The family’s demands for answers got even louder following the revelation that a member of the Ames police department suggested twice that officers call off the chase.
“He took off with my truck. I call the police, and they kill him,” James said. “”It was over a damn pack of cigarettes.”
McPherson is currently on paid leave pending the results of his department’s investigation.

Source: ATL Nightspots.com

Friday, 8 November 2013

Private prisons: How US corporations make money out of locking you up

Today the US is home to 5% of the world's population but a quarter of the world's prisoners. It also has the highest rate of youth imprisonment and on any given day there are more than 70,000 youths in detention. And the biggest winners of this mass incarceration? The for-profit prison companies whose business models essentially depend on locking more and more people up.




Sunday, 3 November 2013

Iraq's Secret War Files

The only TV doc to have advance access to the biggest Wikileaks release ever. This is what really happened during the Iraq war, not what the US PR machine of the time wanted us to believe. The reality behind the civilian death count; al-Qaeda's fictitious presence; torture, torture and more torture. A wall of truth revealing unprecedented levels of unwarranted aggression.



Similar Article:

IRAN LIE same as IRAQ LIE



Thursday, 31 October 2013

ObamaCare: What You're Not Being Told



When it comes to the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, a large percentage of the public is completely misinformed about what the law actually entails. Many of these misconceptions have been intentionally cultivated by political pundits from both the left and the right, and predictably people have latched on to the distortions which most closely fit into their world view. Let's remove all the party politics and set the record straight.
One the most prevalent misconceptions about ObamaCare is that it is socialized medicine. Some view this as good thing, others view it as a bad thing, but that debate irrelevant because it simply isn't true.
Socialized medicine like they have in France, provides all citizens with healthcare services regardless of their income bracket and pays for it through taxes. That's not what Obamacare does at all. ObamaCare is designed to force every person in the United States to acquire health insurance from private companies, regardless of where you get it. If your employer doesn't provide it then you must purchase it on your own. If you don't, you will be penalized and that penalty will be collected by IRS. This is referred to as the individual mandate. According to a recent Gallup poll 43% of uninsured Americans are completely unaware that the individual mandate (and the penalty associated with it) exists at all. The IRS however will clear that up for people soon enough.
40% unaware of individual mandate: http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/308799-poll-many-uninsured-are-unaware-of-individual-mandate
Now most conservatives were outraged by the individual mandate, while most liberals came out in its defense. This is ironic beyond belief. The idea for the individual mandate actually originated from The Heritage Foundation, a "conservative" think tank who now is coming out attacking ObamaCare. ObamaCare is modeled after the system put in place in Massachusetts by Mitt Romney (aka RomneyCare). Both sides were hoping you wouldn't notice that little detail.
Heritage Foundation invented the individual mandate:http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2011/10/20/how-a-conservative-...
How RomneyCare foretells Obamacare's failure: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20131029/OPINION01/310290010/Romneycare-foretells-Obamacare-failure
There has also been quite a bit of disinformation surrounding the penalties. The penalty for not buying insurance was set up to increase gradually. In 2014 the minimal penalty is $95 or 1% of taxable income (whichever is larger), in 2015 it is $325 or 2% of taxable income, and in 2016 it is $695 or 2.5% of taxable income. The maximum penalty per family is currently capped at no more than 300% of the minimum penalty (so in 2016 that would be $695 x 300% = $2,085). Of course you'd have to be pretty naive to think that these minimum penalties won't be increased over time. Remember when the income tax was first implemented most of the population only had to pay 1% of their paychecks to the Federal government. The percentage is obviously much higher now.
The penalty for not buying insurance starts small and grows each year to reduce backlash. It also gives the laws backers a convenient talking point. After all $95 is no big deal. Of course you only get a penalty that low if you make less than $9,500 a year, which is well below the poverty line in the U.S. That minimum penalty, which goes up to $695 in 2016 may not seem like much to the uber-wealthy congressmen who wrote this bill, but for those scraping by month to month it would be a very painful blow. This is of course where the insurance subsidies come in. Many of those in the lower income brackets will qualify for tax breaks to cover part of their insurance cost if they participate. This sounds kinda like socialism, but the big difference is this: in socialism there is no middle man. With Obamacare the insurance companies are still getting paid the full amount and those insurance companies are making a profit. So in reality this isn't socialism, it's not even capitalism, it's corporatism.
Many families don't qualify for the subsidies: http://money.cnn.com/2013/10/10/news/economy/obamacare-families/
And this brings us to the crux of the issue: the permanent middle man. Health insurance was originally intended as a rarely used protection to cover major sicknesses or injuries. You would still pay for your normal doctor visits when you needed them, but if you got hit by a bus and weren't able to work your insurance would make sure that your hospital bills got covered. Kind of like car insurance. Since then, the situation has gradually evolved to the point where insurance is used to cover virtually everything, from routine checkups to pharmaceuticals. People don't want to pay anything directly, they want the insurance companies to cover it, and the market has adapted to this expectation. It's not hard to understand how some would see this as a positive development, after all who doesn't like free stuff. Just one problem, it's not free, in fact this trend has led to radically higher insurance premiums and medical costs.
Using health insurance to cover routine expenses like checkups and antibiotics is like having gasoline insurance for your car. You still end up paying for the product in question, but you inherently end up paying more because you have a middle man between you and the seller, and that middle man is making a profit.
Obamacare takes this already distorted system and codifies it into law, forcing you to pay that middle man and using state intimidation in the form of the IRS to back it up. This provides health insurance companies with a captive customer base that has no way out.
Now supporters will tell you that the individual mandate is necessary to keep insurance prices from rising, after all the law is called the Affordable Health Care Act, but as it turns out for most insurance premiums are dramatically rising as the law rolls out. According to Forbes initial figures indicate that premiums will rise 99% for men and 62% for women on average nation wide with some states seeing increases of 300%. Of course if you in a low income bracket these massive increases are somewhat offset by the federal subsidies, but again the insurance companies still get paid the full amount. So where is that money going to come from? You could say the government is going to pay for it, but the Federal government is already 17 trillion dollars in debt, and that debt is growing faster every day. To pin all your hopes on the U.S. government covering the tab or to assume that you are going to get something for nothing is just magical thinking.
Mainstream pundits say that the individual mandate is necessary to prevent cost from rising: http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/the-exchange/without-individual-mandate-o...
Obamacare Will Increase Avg. Individual-Market Insurance Premiums By 99% For Men, 62% For Women :http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/09/25/double-down-obamaca...
North Carolina massive price increases: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/10/06/4365331/insurance-premium-increases-shock.html#.Um7LCyRQ2rL
Here's what it comes down to: this law is a manifestation of short sighted greed. It's a half baked scheme designed to siphon money out of the middle class and line the pockets of the filthy rich. That captive customer base, with the corporate welfare propping it up translates into big profits for insurance companies. According to the New York Times over the last 12 months, the stock prices of the top five publicly traded health insurance companies have increased by an average of 32 percent, while the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has risen by just 24 percent.
Insurance companies see their stock prices rising disproportionately with the ObamaCare rollout:http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/27/business/insurers-stocks-unhurt-by-the...
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/07/14/269187/health-insurers-gain-from-exchanges
This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. The terms of ObamaCare were negotiated behind closed doors between insurance executives and government officials even though Obama promised that those negotiations would be broadcast over c-span.
Gibbs refuses to answer questions about Obama's about face: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748703481004574646560762972536
What did you think would be the result of those closed door meetings? Did you really think that the insurance companies would be looking out for the interest of the people?



Nothing new here guys, it's just good old fashioned greed and corruption. What you thought Obama was going be looking out for your interest? The same Obama who signed the NDAA giving the military the power to detain anyone indefinitely without trial? The same Obama who maintains a secret kill list, who defends the NSA's domestic spying program, and has massively expanded the drone program? That Obama? Come on, seriously? You can't be that naive.
Listen, we aren't even scratching the surface of this fiasco. We're not going to go into detail about the disastrous rollout of the HealthCare.gov website, or how millions of people are getting their existing policies canceled because of ObamaCare (more in fact than were able to successfully sign up in the exchanges), and we're not going to try to estimate how much higher prices will rise in the years ahead. But rest assured, this train wreck is just getting started.
When people come to terms with something like this they tend to ask the same thing: what can we do? You really want to know?
Disobey. That's the only non-violent solution. The politicians aren't going to help you guys. I know you'd prefer an answer that puts the responsibility on someone else, but that wouldn't be honest. Until the people fully come to terms with the fact that this so called government is run by criminals and that we have no moral obligation to obey criminals, then nothing is going to improve. It's as simple as that.
More Americans have had their insurance canceled than have signed up in the exchanges: http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/10/24/more-americans-have-had-their-insurance-canceled-under-obamacare-than-have-filed-an-exchange-account
***BONUS CONTENT***
It turns out that the multi-million dollar no-bid contract to build the disastrous HealthCare.gov website was handed over to a company called CGI, and one of Michelle Obama's classmates from Princeton (Toni Townes-Whitley) just happens to be top level executive of that company.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/michelle-obamas-princeton-classmate-is...
Of course just being classmates doesn't really prove anything, after all Princeton is a big school, but the Whitley family spending Christmas with the Obama's in 2010 and getting their picture taken together... well that indicates a personal relationship. We took this screenshot directly from a public post made on Toni Townes-Whitley's facebook profile. The picture was uploaded on December 28th, 2010.
Toni Townes-Whitley's facebook profile:https://www.facebook.com/tonitwhitley
Toni and her husband spending Christmas with the Obama's at the White House: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=134031659989997&set=a.1340316033...
To know the full extent of their relationship and to be able to establish whether these backdoor dealings were in fact criminal in nature would require a real investigation, and with the Obamas personally on the line you can rest assured that they will do everything in their power to prevent that from happening. In the mean time we felt that you should at least see this information.
And to top it off...


Article Source: StormCloudsGathering

More great SCG Videos:


The Next Terrorist Attack - What The Mainstream Media Isn't Telling You 


 When Will The Economy Collapse?


 The Blunt Truth about The Travyon Martin Case


 Egyptian Revolution: What You're Not Being told


 The Chain of Obedience


 Revolution: An Instruction Manual


 So You Want to Topple the U.S. Government?


 The Best Kept Secrets of The Dollar


 The Death Throes of the United States


 Leaked Document: Military Internment Camps in U.S to be Used for Political Dissidents


 After America Collapses, What Comes Next?


 U.S. Government Preparing for Collapse


 The Snowden Case What You're Not Being Told


 Why a Dollar & Euro Collapse Is Guaranteed


 The Truth about The Social Contract


 The Chain of Identity