Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 December 2013

Stop the 11% pay rise for MPs' salaries to David Cameron



This petition will be delivered to:
David Cameron

David Cameron: Stop the 11% pay rise for MPs' salaries


Within weeks David Cameron will be making a decision on the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority recommendation for a 11% pay rise on MPs' salaries.
Initially the pay rise was meant to come with the scrapping of expenses (they use our taxes to pay for their daily meals, travel, expenses for second homes and duck ponds etc) but now they are demanding the pay rise whilst keeping their expenses intact. All the while they are cutting benefits for vulnerable families, freezing salaries for our most loved nurses and sacking the police we need to keep our communities safe.
The British people can't take much more of this, the blatant stealing from the poor to give to the rich is getting out of hand and it's clearly apparent that the current government are also silencing mainstream media to keep important changes from us.
We, the British public are part of a democratic society and need to express our disgust at the proposals to yet again, give bonuses and pay rises to those who not only don't need them, but don't deserve them! They should not receive a pay rise of any kind during this desperate economic time. MPs should refuse a pay rise or bonus to show that we're truly 'in this together.' 
Please sign this petition and share with your family and friends, don't be complacent and believe this will all go away, or that it's too late; it's never too late to use your voice.
Much love and support to everyone who is struggling due to the actions of this Government.  







Monday, 9 December 2013

Russell Brand's "Messiah Complex" Watch It For Free . Full Show

If you didn't see it live or  you've seen the show and want a reminder, here's Russell's latest show "Messiah Complex" in full. Plenty to think about here: who are our heroes, why are they our heroes, should they be, how are they represented, have we chosen them for ourselves or have they been chosen for us...
He touches on a number of issues pertaining to modern culture, politically, economically, environmentally, etc. Also, it's quite funny.

Filmed at the Hammersmith Apollo in London, 2013.
If you haven't seen him live and still have the chance, I recommend you do!



Hope you enjoyed the show !

Please LIKE OUR PAGE on Facebook

This image is a thumbnail only



Friday, 6 December 2013

Three Ideas to Help Russell Brand Become Prime Minister


Many of us have seen the Jeremy Paxman, Russell Brand interview . It makes great watching and has gone viral.
Fair enough to Russell - not many people can manage Paxo like that - whilst he rightly identifies some big problems in society and the economy today. Whatever you think of this long-haired, exotic enigma, he's hugely articulate in his diagnosis.
Russell Brand for PM some shout and if he's ever to seize the keys to Number 10, here are three ideas I think could help him solve some of his major grievances with the world today.
Solving the riddle of inequality
Russell cites the problem of massive inequality today and how such a small number of people own all the wealth. All the while a growing under-class is emerging without education, hope or any stake in society.
He's not wrong there and stats from the USA are typical of what's been happening across the advanced world. Incomes for the top 1% in the US are up over 400% since 1979, whilst incomes for the great majority of normal people have possibly even declined in real terms.
People have a range of explanations for what's causing this trend in wealth inequality. Some argue it's because of failings in capitalism, greedy bankers or caused by education and skills differentials.
Another group argue that this inequality is being caused by the nature of money itself. They talk of something called 'fiat money' and how money printing leads to great social injustices where the elite constantly get richer at the expense of Joe Public.
I think Russell should take a look at this argument about money itself. There's a great YouTube video about it here.
If this money issue really is at the heart of it though, Russ, there's lots you can do about it. Perhaps the Bank of England could stop printing money and start printing your rizzlers? There's also new competition to government money today in the form of digital currencies and some of these new community-based monies are growing out of the UK - Feathercoin, a younger competitor to Bitcoin, is a good example.
How to return politics to the people
Another issue Russell is spot on with is his damning assessment of British politics.
I agree with him that no matter which way you vote all our politicians seem to have vested interests, paymasters outside of Parliament and are generally out of touch with the folks that voted them in. Others highlighting this problem have called it the 'cosy Westminster consensus', where a LibLabCon political elite operate in their own bubble.
Again there are differing opinions about what's gone so wrong with our democracy today and how we can clean it up make parliament more accountable and representative. Some of the best ideas I've seen bandied around include 'open primaries' and more regular by-elections.
Open primaries are said to create much more competition at the local level, where anyone can challenge the political incumbent and be voted in if they better represent local interests. Open primaries could help local people all over the country reclaim political power back to their constituencies and move beyond the today's tired, narrow party system.
More regular by-elections for MPs could also help us improve our politics, by making MPs more responsive to our needs and communities. Regular votes to retain our mandate prevent MPs from getting in and then breaking all their promises they made to us, as they tow the party line to further their own ends.
Well, there you are Russ, just a couple of ideas for you, in case they're useful.
Oh, and if this does help and you get into power and start having P Diddy-like parties in Downing Street; spare us an invite!



Follow Will Bancroft on Twitter: www.twitter.com/billybankers

Like Our Page On Facebook here: Russell Brand For Prime Minister

Saturday, 30 November 2013

Russell Brand rages at the Sun and Rupert Murdoch


The Sun on Sunday lied about me last week. Have they learned nothing?

Not a big deal in the scheme of things, but it's still the same fecund bone-yard of gossip, poison and lies
The Sun on Sunday, which is of course the News of the World with a different hat on, lied about me last week.
In the general scheme of things, the crumbling economy, the savaged environment, the treacherous, inept, deceitful politicians that govern us, the corrupt corporations that exploit us, it might not seem like a big deal. That's because it isn't to anyone, except me or my girlfriend. The pain, disruption and distress, that the Sun inflicted by falsely claiming that I cheated on my girlfriend, in the context of such awesome corruption, is a pale liver-spot on the back of Murdoch's glabrous claw. Still though, it's a tiny part of the demon's dermatology and as such, connected to all the other pestilence. Here's how.
Storytelling is important, whether it's a ruddy and robust town crier or Homer (I mean the Greek one but the other one counts too). The manner in which we receive information can affect us as much as the information itself. There is a certain duty that comes with being the anointed purveyor of truth. Can we trust that our media is fulfilling that duty? Who do they really serve? Everyone knows papers like the Daily Mail and the Sun can't be trusted, we've come to accept their duplicity as part of their charm, and their defence, that it's only really celebrities and people that deserve intrusion who are affected, while superficially true in this case, is actually the biggest lie of them all.
We all remember the worst lies, the ones where the red tops are caught red-handed, like Hillsborough, where the Sun enthusiastically heaped more pain on the grieving people of Liverpool by claiming that innocent fans had pissed on police and rifled through the possessions of their dead fellows under the front-page headline "The Truth". We remember the disgust we shared on learning that the News of the World hacked into the voicemail of a missing child who turned out to have been murdered. We all know too that they were said to have hacked the phones of dead British soldiers, victims of 7/7 and murdered Sarah Payne's mum. These people are not celebrities, they are only known through grave misfortune and then through calculated desecration.

Thursday, 28 November 2013

How Ron Paul Was Cheated Out Of Presidency

A compilation of footage that shows how the establishment used illegal tactics to get Ron Paul out of the presidential running. Everything from bias to voter fraud.

Youtube have already tried to remove this video so please share before it's removed again.



The image below is a thumbnail only

Monday, 25 November 2013

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

10 Assassinations That Shook The World

From politicians to royals, here are 10 high profile assassinations that shook the world.





Thursday, 31 October 2013

ObamaCare: What You're Not Being Told



When it comes to the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, a large percentage of the public is completely misinformed about what the law actually entails. Many of these misconceptions have been intentionally cultivated by political pundits from both the left and the right, and predictably people have latched on to the distortions which most closely fit into their world view. Let's remove all the party politics and set the record straight.
One the most prevalent misconceptions about ObamaCare is that it is socialized medicine. Some view this as good thing, others view it as a bad thing, but that debate irrelevant because it simply isn't true.
Socialized medicine like they have in France, provides all citizens with healthcare services regardless of their income bracket and pays for it through taxes. That's not what Obamacare does at all. ObamaCare is designed to force every person in the United States to acquire health insurance from private companies, regardless of where you get it. If your employer doesn't provide it then you must purchase it on your own. If you don't, you will be penalized and that penalty will be collected by IRS. This is referred to as the individual mandate. According to a recent Gallup poll 43% of uninsured Americans are completely unaware that the individual mandate (and the penalty associated with it) exists at all. The IRS however will clear that up for people soon enough.
40% unaware of individual mandate: http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/308799-poll-many-uninsured-are-unaware-of-individual-mandate
Now most conservatives were outraged by the individual mandate, while most liberals came out in its defense. This is ironic beyond belief. The idea for the individual mandate actually originated from The Heritage Foundation, a "conservative" think tank who now is coming out attacking ObamaCare. ObamaCare is modeled after the system put in place in Massachusetts by Mitt Romney (aka RomneyCare). Both sides were hoping you wouldn't notice that little detail.
Heritage Foundation invented the individual mandate:http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2011/10/20/how-a-conservative-...
How RomneyCare foretells Obamacare's failure: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20131029/OPINION01/310290010/Romneycare-foretells-Obamacare-failure
There has also been quite a bit of disinformation surrounding the penalties. The penalty for not buying insurance was set up to increase gradually. In 2014 the minimal penalty is $95 or 1% of taxable income (whichever is larger), in 2015 it is $325 or 2% of taxable income, and in 2016 it is $695 or 2.5% of taxable income. The maximum penalty per family is currently capped at no more than 300% of the minimum penalty (so in 2016 that would be $695 x 300% = $2,085). Of course you'd have to be pretty naive to think that these minimum penalties won't be increased over time. Remember when the income tax was first implemented most of the population only had to pay 1% of their paychecks to the Federal government. The percentage is obviously much higher now.
The penalty for not buying insurance starts small and grows each year to reduce backlash. It also gives the laws backers a convenient talking point. After all $95 is no big deal. Of course you only get a penalty that low if you make less than $9,500 a year, which is well below the poverty line in the U.S. That minimum penalty, which goes up to $695 in 2016 may not seem like much to the uber-wealthy congressmen who wrote this bill, but for those scraping by month to month it would be a very painful blow. This is of course where the insurance subsidies come in. Many of those in the lower income brackets will qualify for tax breaks to cover part of their insurance cost if they participate. This sounds kinda like socialism, but the big difference is this: in socialism there is no middle man. With Obamacare the insurance companies are still getting paid the full amount and those insurance companies are making a profit. So in reality this isn't socialism, it's not even capitalism, it's corporatism.
Many families don't qualify for the subsidies: http://money.cnn.com/2013/10/10/news/economy/obamacare-families/
And this brings us to the crux of the issue: the permanent middle man. Health insurance was originally intended as a rarely used protection to cover major sicknesses or injuries. You would still pay for your normal doctor visits when you needed them, but if you got hit by a bus and weren't able to work your insurance would make sure that your hospital bills got covered. Kind of like car insurance. Since then, the situation has gradually evolved to the point where insurance is used to cover virtually everything, from routine checkups to pharmaceuticals. People don't want to pay anything directly, they want the insurance companies to cover it, and the market has adapted to this expectation. It's not hard to understand how some would see this as a positive development, after all who doesn't like free stuff. Just one problem, it's not free, in fact this trend has led to radically higher insurance premiums and medical costs.
Using health insurance to cover routine expenses like checkups and antibiotics is like having gasoline insurance for your car. You still end up paying for the product in question, but you inherently end up paying more because you have a middle man between you and the seller, and that middle man is making a profit.
Obamacare takes this already distorted system and codifies it into law, forcing you to pay that middle man and using state intimidation in the form of the IRS to back it up. This provides health insurance companies with a captive customer base that has no way out.
Now supporters will tell you that the individual mandate is necessary to keep insurance prices from rising, after all the law is called the Affordable Health Care Act, but as it turns out for most insurance premiums are dramatically rising as the law rolls out. According to Forbes initial figures indicate that premiums will rise 99% for men and 62% for women on average nation wide with some states seeing increases of 300%. Of course if you in a low income bracket these massive increases are somewhat offset by the federal subsidies, but again the insurance companies still get paid the full amount. So where is that money going to come from? You could say the government is going to pay for it, but the Federal government is already 17 trillion dollars in debt, and that debt is growing faster every day. To pin all your hopes on the U.S. government covering the tab or to assume that you are going to get something for nothing is just magical thinking.
Mainstream pundits say that the individual mandate is necessary to prevent cost from rising: http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/the-exchange/without-individual-mandate-o...
Obamacare Will Increase Avg. Individual-Market Insurance Premiums By 99% For Men, 62% For Women :http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/09/25/double-down-obamaca...
North Carolina massive price increases: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/10/06/4365331/insurance-premium-increases-shock.html#.Um7LCyRQ2rL
Here's what it comes down to: this law is a manifestation of short sighted greed. It's a half baked scheme designed to siphon money out of the middle class and line the pockets of the filthy rich. That captive customer base, with the corporate welfare propping it up translates into big profits for insurance companies. According to the New York Times over the last 12 months, the stock prices of the top five publicly traded health insurance companies have increased by an average of 32 percent, while the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has risen by just 24 percent.
Insurance companies see their stock prices rising disproportionately with the ObamaCare rollout:http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/27/business/insurers-stocks-unhurt-by-the...
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/07/14/269187/health-insurers-gain-from-exchanges
This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. The terms of ObamaCare were negotiated behind closed doors between insurance executives and government officials even though Obama promised that those negotiations would be broadcast over c-span.
Gibbs refuses to answer questions about Obama's about face: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748703481004574646560762972536
What did you think would be the result of those closed door meetings? Did you really think that the insurance companies would be looking out for the interest of the people?



Nothing new here guys, it's just good old fashioned greed and corruption. What you thought Obama was going be looking out for your interest? The same Obama who signed the NDAA giving the military the power to detain anyone indefinitely without trial? The same Obama who maintains a secret kill list, who defends the NSA's domestic spying program, and has massively expanded the drone program? That Obama? Come on, seriously? You can't be that naive.
Listen, we aren't even scratching the surface of this fiasco. We're not going to go into detail about the disastrous rollout of the HealthCare.gov website, or how millions of people are getting their existing policies canceled because of ObamaCare (more in fact than were able to successfully sign up in the exchanges), and we're not going to try to estimate how much higher prices will rise in the years ahead. But rest assured, this train wreck is just getting started.
When people come to terms with something like this they tend to ask the same thing: what can we do? You really want to know?
Disobey. That's the only non-violent solution. The politicians aren't going to help you guys. I know you'd prefer an answer that puts the responsibility on someone else, but that wouldn't be honest. Until the people fully come to terms with the fact that this so called government is run by criminals and that we have no moral obligation to obey criminals, then nothing is going to improve. It's as simple as that.
More Americans have had their insurance canceled than have signed up in the exchanges: http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/10/24/more-americans-have-had-their-insurance-canceled-under-obamacare-than-have-filed-an-exchange-account
***BONUS CONTENT***
It turns out that the multi-million dollar no-bid contract to build the disastrous HealthCare.gov website was handed over to a company called CGI, and one of Michelle Obama's classmates from Princeton (Toni Townes-Whitley) just happens to be top level executive of that company.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/michelle-obamas-princeton-classmate-is...
Of course just being classmates doesn't really prove anything, after all Princeton is a big school, but the Whitley family spending Christmas with the Obama's in 2010 and getting their picture taken together... well that indicates a personal relationship. We took this screenshot directly from a public post made on Toni Townes-Whitley's facebook profile. The picture was uploaded on December 28th, 2010.
Toni Townes-Whitley's facebook profile:https://www.facebook.com/tonitwhitley
Toni and her husband spending Christmas with the Obama's at the White House: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=134031659989997&set=a.1340316033...
To know the full extent of their relationship and to be able to establish whether these backdoor dealings were in fact criminal in nature would require a real investigation, and with the Obamas personally on the line you can rest assured that they will do everything in their power to prevent that from happening. In the mean time we felt that you should at least see this information.
And to top it off...


Article Source: StormCloudsGathering

More great SCG Videos:


The Next Terrorist Attack - What The Mainstream Media Isn't Telling You 


 When Will The Economy Collapse?


 The Blunt Truth about The Travyon Martin Case


 Egyptian Revolution: What You're Not Being told


 The Chain of Obedience


 Revolution: An Instruction Manual


 So You Want to Topple the U.S. Government?


 The Best Kept Secrets of The Dollar


 The Death Throes of the United States


 Leaked Document: Military Internment Camps in U.S to be Used for Political Dissidents


 After America Collapses, What Comes Next?


 U.S. Government Preparing for Collapse


 The Snowden Case What You're Not Being Told


 Why a Dollar & Euro Collapse Is Guaranteed


 The Truth about The Social Contract


 The Chain of Identity